Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video491 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Webster University results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anchoring Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 1,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (15,019 of 28,621 keywords). This Webster University is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Webster University
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠48%Webster University (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,964
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Webster University attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Webster University vs sitewide
Webster University attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos