Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,560 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington County Water Conservancy District results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,247 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (15,804 of 28,625 keywords). This Washington County Water Conservancy District is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Washington County Water Conservancy District
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,247
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Washington County Water Conservancy District attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Washington County Water Conservancy District vs sitewide
Washington County Water Conservancy District attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos