Keyword summary
100%1 analyzed article/video482 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Hawks results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 411 hits. Analysis detected 3,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,446 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,569 of 37,530 keywords). This War Hawks is worse (more manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group.
War Hawks
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
War Hawks attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
War Hawks vs sitewide
War Hawks attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.