Keyword summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video1,055 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Villanova University’s Farmworker Legal Aid Clinic results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 396 hits. Analysis detected 3,097 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (25,987 of 55,736 keywords). This Villanova University’s Farmworker Legal Aid Clinic is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Villanova University’s Farmworker Legal Aid Clinic
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,220
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos