Keyword summary
â 36% 1 analyzed article/video 1,757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Videodrome results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,098 hits . Analysis detected 3,686 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of â 36% (37,421 of 58,070 keywords). This Videodrome is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group. Videodrome
Keyword details
Total words: 7,028
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.6% 15.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst