Keyword summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 358 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vermont Fish And Wildlife Department results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 182 hits . Analysis detected 1,800 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 83% (9,303 of 53,520 keywords). This Vermont Fish And Wildlife Department is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group. Vermont Fish And Wildlife Department
Keyword details
Total words: 1,432
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.6% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst