Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos780 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Iran Talks results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 478 hits. Analysis detected 3,550 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,024 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (19,030 of 28,615 keywords). This US Iran Talks is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
US Iran Talks
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
US Iran Talks attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
US Iran Talks vs sitewide
US Iran Talks attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.