Keyword summary
18%1 analyzed article/video301 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Of Texas Board Of Regents results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 140 hits. Analysis detected 619 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 81% (10,010 of 50,724 keywords). This University Of Texas Board Of Regents is worse (more manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
University Of Texas Board Of Regents
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
University Of Texas Board Of Regents attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
University Of Texas Board Of Regents vs sitewide
University Of Texas Board Of Regents attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.