Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video820 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump Nomination results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 860 hits. Analysis detected 2,935 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,676 of 28,615 keywords). This Trump Nomination is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Trump Nomination
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠60%Trump Nomination (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,280
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Trump Nomination attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Trump Nomination vs sitewide
Trump Nomination attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos