Keyword summary
5%1 analyzed article/video417 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump E Jean Carroll Defamation Supreme Court results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 538 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 56% (22,331 of 50,052 keywords). This Trump E Jean Carroll Defamation Supreme Court is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Trump E Jean Carroll Defamation Supreme Court
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Trump E Jean Carroll Defamation Supreme Court attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Trump E Jean Carroll Defamation Supreme Court vs sitewide
Trump E Jean Carroll Defamation Supreme Court attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.