Keyword summary
79%1 analyzed article/video1,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Transit Funding results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 909 hits. Analysis detected 4,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,882 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 73% (8,710 of 31,925 keywords). This Transit Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Transit Funding
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Transit Funding attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Transit Funding vs sitewide
Transit Funding attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.