Author summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video1,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathalie Graham results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 909 hits. Analysis detected 4,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,882 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (1,308 of 5,769 authors). This Nathalie Graham is worse (more manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Nathalie Graham
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠78%Nathalie Graham (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,882
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nathalie Graham attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nathalie Graham vs sitewide
Nathalie Graham attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos