Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,291 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Toronto Metropolitan University results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and In-Group Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 527 hits. Analysis detected 2,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,798 of 29,241 keywords). This Toronto Metropolitan University is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Toronto Metropolitan University
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠22%Toronto Metropolitan University (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,164
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Toronto Metropolitan University attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Toronto Metropolitan University vs sitewide
Toronto Metropolitan University attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos