Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Refunds 2026 results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 80.7% saturation with 968 hits. Analysis detected 6,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (159 of 25,938 keywords). This Tax Refunds 2026 is worse (more manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
Tax Refunds 2026
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠100%Tax Refunds 2026 (selected)27%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,200
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Tax Refunds 2026 attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Tax Refunds 2026 vs All Other Publications
Tax Refunds 2026 attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos