Keyword summary
100% 1 analyzed article/video 1,158 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Talking Filibuster results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Ad Hominem , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 43% saturation with 1,994 hits . Analysis detected 11,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,632 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 89% (6,547 of 59,653 keywords). This Talking Filibuster is worse (more manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group. Talking Filibuster
Keyword details
Total words: 4,632
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.0% percentile 5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 43.0% 43.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.1% 21.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 22.4% 22.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 43.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 22.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst