Keyword summary
⁠33%2 analyzed articles/videos895 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 697 hits. Analysis detected 5,276 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,268 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (20,315 of 33,509 keywords). This Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 6,268
Article count: 2
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program vs sitewide
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos