Author summary
93%1 analyzed article/video531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Parra results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 443 hits. Analysis detected 1,681 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,593 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 85% (854 of 5,690 authors). This Daniel Parra is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
Daniel Parra
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Daniel Parra attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Daniel Parra vs sitewide
Daniel Parra attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.