Keyword summary
51%1 analyzed article/video785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Storage Chips results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 303 hits. Analysis detected 1,936 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 54% (24,537 of 53,020 keywords). This Storage Chips is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Storage Chips
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
54%Storage Chips (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,140
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos