Keyword summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stocks Markets AI Oil Trump Rates results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 320 hits. Analysis detected 1,276 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,936 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (31,901 of 51,680 keywords). This Stocks Markets AI Oil Trump Rates is better (less manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Stocks Markets AI Oil Trump Rates
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠39%Stocks Markets AI Oil Trump Rates (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,936
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

38% percentile
025507510038.3% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Tu Quoque: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos