Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,417 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stanford Stadium results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 433 hits. Analysis detected 2,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,251 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,162 of 28,615 keywords). This Stanford Stadium is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Stanford Stadium
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠47%Stanford Stadium (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,251
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Stanford Stadium attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Stanford Stadium vs sitewide
Stanford Stadium attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos