Keyword summary
⁠22%1 analyzed article/video663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stanford Economist results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 520 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,326 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (18,864 of 33,051 keywords). This Stanford Economist is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Stanford Economist
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠43%Stanford Economist (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,326
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Stanford Economist attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Stanford Economist vs sitewide
Stanford Economist attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos