Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,080 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stan Chisholm results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 221 hits. Analysis detected 1,130 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (27,173 of 28,615 keywords). This Stan Chisholm is better (less manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group.
Stan Chisholm
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠5%Stan Chisholm (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,320
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Stan Chisholm attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Stan Chisholm vs sitewide
Stan Chisholm attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos