Keyword summary
⁠26%1 analyzed article/video222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These South Dallas Fair Park Area Plan results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 344 faulty-reasoning hits from 888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (10,582 of 57,028 keywords). This South Dallas Fair Park Area Plan is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
South Dallas Fair Park Area Plan
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 888
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles888 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos