Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sons Of The Sweet Science results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 716 hits. Analysis detected 4,816 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,725 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,265 of 28,628 keywords). This Sons Of The Sweet Science is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Sons Of The Sweet Science
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠61%Sons Of The Sweet Science (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,725
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Sons Of The Sweet Science attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Sons Of The Sweet Science vs sitewide
Sons Of The Sweet Science attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos