Keyword summary
38% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,911 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simon & Schuster results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 2,245 hits . Analysis detected 11,970 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,644 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 13% (46,673 of 53,343 keywords). This Simon & Schuster is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group. Simon & Schuster
Keyword details
Total words: 19,644
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles19.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst