Keyword summary
0%11 analyzed articles/videos6,150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Elections results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 6,708 hits. Analysis detected 42,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,248 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (15,082 of 28,615 keywords). This Senate Elections is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Senate Elections
Keyword details
Total words: 29,248
Article count: 11
Authors
Showing top 48 attributes by prevalence for chart readability.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Senate Elections attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Senate Elections vs sitewide
Senate Elections attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.