Keyword summary
54%1 analyzed article/video1,140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Center results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 850 hits. Analysis detected 4,725 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,698 of 38,317 keywords). This Seattle Center is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Seattle Center
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Seattle Center attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Seattle Center vs sitewide
Seattle Center attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.