Keyword summary
48% 1 analyzed article/video 159 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Care Department results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 102 hits . Analysis detected 551 faulty-reasoning hits from 636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 89% (6,632 of 56,260 keywords). This Seattle Care Department is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Seattle Care Department
Keyword details
Total words: 636
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.2% percentile 5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles636 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst