Keyword summary
⁠85%4 analyzed articles/videos2,746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scientists results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 1,524 hits. Analysis detected 10,588 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,542 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (17,839 of 27,006 keywords). This Scientists is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Scientists
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠34%Scientists (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Scientists attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Scientists vs sitewide
Scientists attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos