Keyword summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video1,856 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scientific Studies results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 435 hits. Analysis detected 3,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (24,424 of 29,954 keywords). This Scientific Studies is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Scientific Studies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠19%Scientific Studies (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,568
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Scientific Studies attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Scientific Studies vs sitewide
Scientific Studies attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos