Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Save Our Bacon Act results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 353 hits. Analysis detected 3,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (15,349 of 37,536 keywords). This Save Our Bacon Act is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Save Our Bacon Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠60%Save Our Bacon Act (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,300
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Save Our Bacon Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Save Our Bacon Act vs sitewide
Save Our Bacon Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos