Keyword summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 1,173 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rift results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 1,033 hits . Analysis detected 2,998 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 43% (34,384 of 59,653 keywords). This Rift is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Rift
Keyword details
Total words: 4,692
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 22.0% 22.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst