Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Radiation Exposure Compensation Act results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 1,306 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,689 of 28,615 keywords). This Radiation Exposure Compensation Act is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Radiation Exposure Compensation Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠42%Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,056
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Radiation Exposure Compensation Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Radiation Exposure Compensation Act vs sitewide
Radiation Exposure Compensation Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos