Keyword summary
25% 1 analyzed article/video 880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Progress For New York Inc results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 135 hits . Analysis detected 1,589 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 29% (42,763 of 59,652 keywords). This Progress For New York Inc is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group. Progress For New York Inc
Keyword details
Total words: 3,520
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst