Keyword summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video659 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prisoners Of War results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 853 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (36,530 of 59,653 keywords). This Prisoners Of War is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Prisoners Of War
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠39%Prisoners Of War (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,636
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos