Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Planned Parenthood Great Rivers results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Status Quo Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 1,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (20,691 of 28,615 keywords). This Planned Parenthood Great Rivers is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Planned Parenthood Great Rivers
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Planned Parenthood Great Rivers attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Planned Parenthood Great Rivers vs sitewide
Planned Parenthood Great Rivers attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.