Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Pica results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and Anchoring Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 189 hits . Analysis detected 631 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,354 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 55,664 keywords). This Pica is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Pica
Keyword details
Total words: 4,354
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst