Keyword summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video1,208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Physicians For Human Rights results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 488 hits. Analysis detected 2,349 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (42,422 of 51,169 keywords). This Physicians For Human Rights is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Physicians For Human Rights
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠18%Physicians For Human Rights (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,832
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Physicians For Human Rights attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Physicians For Human Rights vs sitewide
Physicians For Human Rights attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos