Keyword summary
5%1 analyzed article/video1,037 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phillip Cerf results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 224 hits. Analysis detected 950 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 14% (43,610 of 50,666 keywords). This Phillip Cerf is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group.
Phillip Cerf
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Phillip Cerf attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Phillip Cerf vs sitewide
Phillip Cerf attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.