Keyword summary
â 30% 1 analyzed article/video 724 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philadelphia Experiment results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Confirmation Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 394 hits . Analysis detected 1,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of â 61% (20,421 of 52,018 keywords). This Philadelphia Experiment is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group. Philadelphia Experiment
Keyword details
Total words: 2,896
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.7% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Fundamental Attribution E⌠Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst