Keyword summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pew Charitable Trusts results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 336 hits. Analysis detected 1,835 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (24,383 of 38,317 keywords). This Pew Charitable Trusts is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Pew Charitable Trusts
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Wyomings Big Show1%
⁠0%Wyoming's Big Show1%
⁠0%Sweetwater Events Complex1%
⁠0%Rock Springs1%
⁠0%Ffa1%
⁠37%Pew Charitable Trusts (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,036
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Pew Charitable Trusts attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Pew Charitable Trusts vs sitewide
Pew Charitable Trusts attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos