Keyword summary
30%1 analyzed article/video890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parc Act results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Status Quo Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 1,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 30% (35,069 of 49,929 keywords). This Parc Act is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Parc Act
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Parc Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Parc Act vs sitewide
Parc Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.