Keyword summary
90% 2 analyzed articles/videos 645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Streets results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 334 hits . Analysis detected 2,177 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,580 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 59% (24,221 of 58,197 keywords). This Nyc Streets is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. Nyc Streets
Keyword details
Total words: 2,580
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst