Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Talks results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,580 hits. Analysis detected 11,320 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,972 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (23,945 of 28,615 keywords). This Nuclear Talks is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Nuclear Talks
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nuclear Talks attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nuclear Talks vs sitewide
Nuclear Talks attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.