Keyword summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video495 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Regulatory Commission results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 337 hits. Analysis detected 1,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (8,784 of 26,602 keywords). This Nuclear Regulatory Commission is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠67%Nuclear Regulatory Commission (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,980
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nuclear Regulatory Commission attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nuclear Regulatory Commission vs sitewide
Nuclear Regulatory Commission attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos