Keyword summary
34%1 analyzed article/video853 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nolia results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 234 hits. Analysis detected 1,590 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,412 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 35% (34,834 of 52,911 keywords). This Nolia is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Nolia
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
35%Nolia (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,412
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

34% percentile
025507510034.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos