Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video544 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nato Spending results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 190 hits. Analysis detected 1,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,552 of 37,536 keywords). This Nato Spending is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Nato Spending
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nato Spending attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nato Spending vs sitewide
Nato Spending attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.