Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video852 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Forest results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 197 hits. Analysis detected 2,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (26,211 of 35,118 keywords). This National Forest is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
National Forest
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
National Forest attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
National Forest vs sitewide
National Forest attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.