Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These National Academies Of Sciences results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 336 hits. Analysis detected 2,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,173 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 28,678 keywords). This National Academies Of Sciences is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
National Academies Of Sciences
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%National Academies Of Sciences (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,173
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
National Academies Of Sciences attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
National Academies Of Sciences vs sitewide
National Academies Of Sciences attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos