Keyword summary
36%1 analyzed article/video1,100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mute Swans results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 421 hits. Analysis detected 2,723 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 46% (28,671 of 53,020 keywords). This Mute Swans is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Mute Swans
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
46%Mute Swans (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,400
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos